Lisa asks: I’m training for my first marathon. What are your thoughts on the best way to carry fluid?
You’re wise to plan ahead. Hydration and proper fuelling are key to successful training, and finding a comfortable strategy will help you complete your long runs. These days, there are a variety of ways to carry (or not have to carry) your fluids. Here are some of my go-to products and methods. Experiment to find what works best for you.
Single Handheld Bottle
Pros: A typical handheld bottle holds around 300-600ml of fluid and includes an adjustable strap to help keep it in place as you run. Most handhelds are ergonomically moulded to fit your hand and have a minimalist approach to storage, with just enough room in the strap’s pocket for electrolyte tabs or a gel. A bottle like this is the way to go if you hate carrying anything around your waist or on your back, for shorter long runs, or for runs where you can fill up along the way.
Cons: Most handheld bottles weigh between 680 to 900g, and having that weight swing at the end of your arm thousands of times during a run can create muscle irritation and alignment issues in your upper body. Carrying only one bottle limits you to one type of fluid at a time.
Pros: Belts allow for hands-free running, accommodate a variety of fluids (so you can put water in some and sports drinks in the others). There is an extra pocket to store fuel and keys. It is sized and made of flexible material for comfort and easier breathing. The weight is well balanced over your hips, which provides a more stable load on your body (versus when you’re carrying a bottle).
Cons: Some runners are uncomfortable carrying anything on their waists. The belt can move if it doesn’t fit well—make sure to buy tight, as the weight of the fluid will pull it down. It takes more time to refill multiple bottles. Although you can carry up to 1kg at a time with a belt, you still need to plan to refill on the longest training runs.
Hydration Pack or Vest
Pros: Hydration packs are the way to go if you want to run for hours and not worry about refilling. They commonly include 1.5- to two-litre bladders and several easy-access pockets for on-the-run fuelling. They offer a bounce-free, hands-free, ergonomic way to carry your fluid and fuel during long training runs. It is a comfortable alternative for those who don’t like wearing belts or carrying bottles.
Cons: Two litres of fluid alone weighs in at 2kg—the weight of the pack will cause you to expend more energy per kilometre. Because there is space in the pack, there is a risk to carry too many items, which can add more needless weight. Using a bladder can make it more difficult to gauge how much fluid you’re consuming because it’s out of sight.
DIY Water Station
Pros: By planning your route around an “water station” (with a cooler full of fluids, sunscreen, and whatever else you might want in your car, or stashed along a route), you needn’t carry anything. For long runs I plan my course and plant my water station at the trailhead of a out and back trail. It allows me to adjust the length of my loops, refuel regularly with fluids, and break up the mileage into smaller pieces.
Cons: You might need to run a fairly short loop or out-and-back on hotert days. It can be tempting to quit a challenging run early if you’re continuously circling back to your house or car.
A Strategic Route
Pros: If you plan a route with ample water fountains, all you need to carry is your fuel. If you plan a route with shops along the way where you can buy water, sports drink, or snacks, you can just carry cash.
Cons: If the fountains are off or the shops are closed, you’re stuck without fluids. Stopping to buy something might delay your run longer than other methods, and the store may not carry (or may be out of) your favourite fuel.